Comparison of MLC and FCM Techniques with Satellite Imagery in A Part of Narmada River Basin of Madhya Pradesh, India
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Comparison of MLC and FCM Techniques with Satellite Imagery in A Part of Narmada River Basin of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Arun Mondal; Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee; India |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Deepak Khare; Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee; India |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sananda Kundu; India |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Landuse, Narmada River Basin, MLC, FCM, Accuracy |
| 4. | Description | Abstract |
Landuse and land cover are most important part which is linked with the environment and climate in various ways. This is also important for the modeling of greenhouse gas emissions, carbon balance etc., and is important for understanding the landscape features. The main objective of the present work is to reduce uncertainties in the landuse and land cover pattern. Remote sensing technique is extremely important for the classification purposes by empirical observation and algorithms. In case of present study, a part of Narmada river basin was taken where change in the landuse and landcover was assessed from the Landsat images of the year 2011 with two classification techniques of Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) and Fuzzy C-Mean (FCM). The major landuse classes are water body, built-up, vegetation, agricultural land and fallow land. The image has been digitally classified by both MLC and FCM algorithms which have been validated by the accuracy assessment process. The overall accuracy achieved by the FCM was about 84% while with MLC it was about 79%. The Survey of India toposheet was used as the base map for the purpose of geo-correction. FCM was found to be more accurate in comparison to MLC because of its soft classification technique. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2013-07-02 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | http://technical.cloud-journals.com/index.php/IJARSG/article/view/Tech-96 |
| 11. | Source | Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) | International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS; Volume 2 (Year 2013) |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions |
Copyright Terms & Conditions Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work Cloud Publications reserves the right to amend/change the copyright policy; with/without notice.
|