Indexing metadata

Optimum Corner Offset for Cubical Corrugated Boxes


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Optimum Corner Offset for Cubical Corrugated Boxes
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Jade Housewirth; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Deliya Duckworth; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Conrrado Jimenez; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Britney Payne; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Yuliana Sanchez-Luna; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Siripong Malasri; Healthcare Packaging Consortium, Gadomski School of Engineering, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, TN, USA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country (doi: 10.23953/cloud.ijapt.377)
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Box Design; Corrugated Box; Diagonal Box Corner
 
4. Description Abstract

Several C-flute single-wall regular slotted cubical corrugated boxes with dimensions from 12X12X12 to 22X22X22 were modified at the four corners with corner offsets from 1 inch to 8 inches to form diagonal (or “two-angle”) corners. They were conditioned at the standard test condition of 73 F  and 50% RH. The optimum corner offset varied from 22% of box dimension to 26% with an average of 24%. The maximum compression strength increased from the regular corner configuration from 23% to 62%, with an average of 44%. In addition, an average of 14% saving on material at optimum corner offset.

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2018-08-11
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier http://technical.cloud-journals.com/index.php/IJAPT/article/view/904
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.23953/904
 
11. Source Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) International Journal of Advanced Packaging Technology; Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
 
12. Language English=en en
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright Terms & Conditions

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work

Cloud Publications reserves the right to amend/change the copyright policy; with/without notice.